|
Train Integrity is the Responsibility of the Railway Undertaking |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 18 June 2010 08:47 |
|
ERTMS/ETCS Level 3 remains to be fully specified but should offer railway infrastructure managers reduced cost and increased capacity. Despite this, existing projects in Europe and around the world are stuck at Level 1 and 2, so the International Technical Committee of the Institution of Railway Signal Engineers has been studying the obstacles to implementing ERTMS/ETCS Level 3. This is one of a series of articles that aim to promote some radical debate on removing these obstacles. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 18 June 2010 09:30 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Semi-automatic, driverless, and unattended operation of trains |
|
|
|
|
Written by IRSE-ITC
|
|
Thursday, 17 June 2010 20:04 |
|
The mission of any metro transportation undertaking is to provide safe, reliable, efficient, high quality service to its passengers in a cost effective fashion. To meet this business need, our metro systems are increasingly being automated. Any new metro system constructed today would almost certainly incorporate some level of automation with many modern metro systems now providing driverless or unattended train operation. In addition, higher levels of automation are also being introduced into the older metro systems around the world in response to demands for increased capacity on the existing infrastructure, enhanced levels of safety, improved customer service, and reduced operating costs. This article examines the benefits of automation, the various levels of automation that can be deployed, the maturity of the technology, and the challenges of selecting the appropriate level of automation for a specific application. The article focuses on automation of metro systems. Automation of our intercity main lines, high speed railways, and freight lines will be addressed in a separate article. |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 June 2010 20:05 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Towards the One Page Safety Case, Less Paperwork, More Assurance |
|
|
|
|
Written by ITC
|
|
Saturday, 13 June 2009 13:51 |
|
It should be possible to produce a “one page safety case” (well perhaps 10 pages max.) and assess it in two weeks. All it takes is to be clever about it and manage the safety assurance processes well. In essence, any project, any supplier that applies the systems- and safety assurance processes that are now the norm in our industry and adequately documents the efforts they are making anyway, should not need more than ten pages and two weeks to explain all that and convince their Independent Safety Assessor (ISA). |
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 17 July 2010 15:22 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
What can signalling do to enhance rail operations? |
|
|
|
|
Written by Alan Rumsey
|
|
Thursday, 21 January 2010 10:42 |
|
Any rail transportation infrastructure, whether metros or mainline railways, represents a tremendous capital investment in terms of the right-of-way and stations, with significant on-going life-cycle costs to maintain the infrastructure in a state-of good repair. This investment is justified on the basis that the infrastructure provides the foundation for the movement of passengers and freight within the network covered by the infrastructure. The actual safe movement of passengers and freight on this infrastructure is however only possible through the implementation of signalling and train control systems. Indeed, it is the signalling/train control systems that enable the return on the infrastructure investment to be realized. While signalling/train control systems are the enabler of rail/transit operations, they can also impose a constraint on operations for example by constraining the achievable line capacity or by limiting the flexibility of train movements while, in addition, incurring substantial ongoing maintenance costs. |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 21 January 2010 11:03 |
|
Read more...
|
|
What is actually keeping Level 3 from happening? |
|
|
|
|
Written by ITC
|
|
Saturday, 16 May 2009 11:19 |
|
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is! ERTMS / ETCS L3 (Level 3) remains to be fully specified but should offer railway infrastructure managers reduced cost and increased infrastructure capacity. Better service, lower fares – what’s not to like about that? Ask an expert and they will say there are a couple of technical issues to be resolved – such as making sure a train doesn’t leave a wagon behind without the knowledge of the control system. Not the sort of problem that would be short of suggested solutions. |
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 16 May 2009 11:22 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |